Mohammad Narimani; Masoud Talebi Jooybari; Abbas Abolqassemi
Volume 3, Issue 10 , March 2013, , Pages 41-64
Abstract
Thepresent paper aims atcomparing the attributionalstyle and resilience in students with visual or motor disabilities and normalstudents. In this applied and field research, the statistical populationincludes all normal and disabled students aged between 15 and 19 years old inSari and Qaemshahr Cities. ...
Read More
Thepresent paper aims atcomparing the attributionalstyle and resilience in students with visual or motor disabilities and normalstudents. In this applied and field research, the statistical populationincludes all normal and disabled students aged between 15 and 19 years old inSari and Qaemshahr Cities. 120 students (60students with visual and motor disability and 60 normal students) from the school of Sari and Qaemshahr cities participated in thestudy. All participants were asked to complete the attributional style questionnaire (ASQ) and (CD-RTS9) resilience questionnaire. Analysis of the data involved both descriptiveand inferential statistics including means, standard deviation, multivariateanalysis of variance, correlation coefficient and multivariate regression. The result of analysis of variance show that there isa significant difference between students with (visual and motor) disabilitiesand normal students in components of unpleasantinternal-external attribution, unpleasant temporary-stable attribution,geneal-specific attribution and resilience. This indicatesa more pessimistic attributionalstyle in the first group. There is a positive correlation betweenattributional style and resiliency. The regressionanalysis shows that the components of attributional style can predict theresiliency (p<0.01). The results of this study suggest that educationprofessionals should embark on planning and implementing combined therapeuticprograms for students with visual and motor disabilities who suffer fromemotional disorders